|
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
The Transportation
Bill is Finally a Reality
On
August 10, 2005, President Bush signed into law the massive transportation
bill "Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act - A Legacy For Users" (SAFETEA-LU), which authorizes $286.5 billion
in guaranteed funding over six years for federal highways and transit
programs. SAFETEA-LU marks a 30 percent increase in funding over
the $218 billion Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
(TEA-21) (PL No: 105-178) legislation that expired September
30, 2003. The long delayed reauthorization also includes $52.6 billion
in transit funding, up almost 46 percent from levels guaranteed
in TEA-21, and several provisions for clean buses. Negotiations
over the transportation reauthorization bill were stalled over disagreements
on funding and other provisions for almost 2 years resulting in
12 extensions before the legislators managed to find common ground
this year. Faced with the prospect of further extensions, the House
and Senate reached a compromise late in July and rushed to send
a bill to the President before the start of August recess.
Significant
changes in the new law include a change in the rate of return for
‘donor’ states that will now see an increased rate of
return up to 92 percent in 2008 from the current rate of 90.5 percent.
Donor states are states contributing more taxes to the Highway
Trust Fund,
the principal source of funds for highway and transit programs,
than they receive in return as highway program dollars. This issue
was a major point of contention in deliberations over the bill in
the last two years with ‘donor” states hoping to see
the level of return rise to 95 percent.
Some
of the key clean bus-related provisions in SAFETEA-LU include: 1) the
reauthorization of the Clean Fuels Program, 2) modest increases in
funding for the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement
(CMAQ) Program as well as expanded project eligibility, 3) a new Clean
School Bus program as well as 4) increased funding for the Fuel Cell
Bus program. In addition, there are several clean bus earmarks as
well as increased funding under the formula grants programs (Urbanized
Areas, Non-Urbanized Areas, Special Needs of Elderly Individuals
and Individuals with Disabilities) which can be used to purchase
cleaner buses.
CONGESTION
MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ)
The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program
received a small increase in funding to $8.6 billion over five years
in comparison to $8.5 billion in TEA-21 over six years. Several
changes have been incorporated in the program including:
-
Expanded
eligibility to include areas which are “maintenance” or in
“non-attainment” of the national air quality standard for PM2.5
(fine particulate matter), for funding. In December
2004, 208 counties were listed to be in non-attainment of the PM2.5
standard. The inclusion of PM2.5
“maintenance” or “non-attainment” areas means that
additional areas will now be eligible for CMAQ funding. In
addition, most counties in non-attainment of the PM2.5 standard
are also in non-attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard. This
creates a situation whereby areas are battling the twin problems
of particulate matter and ozone pollution while the available
CMAQ funds remain largely the same.
-
Expansion of project eligibility to include:
a. Advanced truck stop electrification systems.
b. Purchase of integrated, interoperable emergency communications
equipment.
c. Purchase of diesel retrofits for non-road vehicles and engines
in construction projects located in non-attainment areas (ozone,
PM10, PM2.5).
d. Outreach activities to provide information and technical assistance
to the owners and operators for diesel equipment and vehicles
regarding the purchase and installation of diesel retrofits.
-
States receiving minimum apportionment would also be able to fund
projects that would be eligible in areas that are maintenance
or non-attainment areas for ozone, PM10 and PM2.5.
- Requires
maintenance and non-attainment areas to place priority of use
on:
a. Diesel retrofits - Eligible retrofits include US Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) or California Air Resources Board (CARB)
verified technologies. Biodiesel is an EPA-verified retrofit
technology.
b. Cost-effective strategies and,
c. Technologies that improve public health.
- Directs
the US Department of Transportation to maintain a database of CMAQ projects
with information on the impacts of these projects.
-
Allows flexibility for certain states (Montana, Maine and Oregon)
to use CMAQ funds for the operation of public transit and passenger
rail services.
-
Also allows Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana
and Ohio to use CMAQ funds for the purchase of biodiesel or other
alternative fuels. This provision is different from earlier
versions of the bill which allowed all states receiving CMAQ funds
to purchase biodiesel.
CLEAN
FUELS GRANT PROGRAM
The Clean Fuels Grant Program which provides funding for clean bus
projects has also been reauthorized in SAFETEA-LU at the level of
$238.1 million over five years. This is a significant cut
in funding when compared to TEA-21 which was authorized at $100
million per year. The Clean Fuels Program was essentially
an unfunded mandate in TEA-21 because of significant delays in rulemaking
by the US Department of Transportation and failure to appropriate money
for the program.
The
new provisions in the program include changes in the funding mechanism
from formula based to discretionary grants. Federal match for projects
also increases from 80 percent to 90 percent. The Clean
Fuels Grant Program is a critical funding source for clean bus purchases,
and EESI will work with other clean bus stakeholders to ensure that
funds are appropriated for this program.
CLEAN
SCHOOL BUS PROGRAM
For the first time ever, SAFETEA-LU establishes a Clean School Bus
Program. The program is authorized at $55 million in 2005 and 2006
with grants being awarded on a competitive basis for the replacement
of the oldest school buses, retrofit of existing buses and purchase
of alternative fuels including biodiesel. Federal cost
share for the purchase of retrofit devices is 100 percent and 25-50
percent for the replacement of buses.
FUEL CELL BUS PROGRAM
SAFETEA-LU also provides funding for a fuel cell bus research and
development program at the level of $49 million over 4 years starting
in 2006. The program is designed to accelerate commercial deployment
of fuel cell buses through technology development. EESI is a member of the National Fuel
Cell Bus Technology Initiative, which is comprised of 30 leading bus
manufacturers, technology providers, and operators.
RESCISSION
OF UNOBLIGATED PROGRAM FUNDS
Included in SAFETEA-LU is a provision requiring states to return
a portion of unobligated highway program funds on September 30,
2009, the day SAFETEA-LU expires. The provision calls for $8.543
billion in rescissions from core program funds including
CMAQ which is a principal source of clean transportation funds.
Rescissions occur on an annual basis with $1.2 billion being rescinded
in 2005 (see related EESI action alert). However, in the past, states
with poor air quality have used CMAQ funds disproportionately to
comply with rescission directives. EESI will continue to
monitor these rescissions and provide guidance to stakeholders on
how to ensure fair treatment of CMAQ funds in the rescissions process.

|
President
Signs Energy Bill
In an effort to advance the
first comprehensive energy policy in 13 years, Congress passed the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (H.R 6) which was then signed into law
by the President on August 8, 2005. The Energy bill which has been
several years in the making contains billions of dollars in tax incentives,
a Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), and several provisions for increasing
cleaner transportation alternatives but does little to reduce oil consumption
in the transportation sector.
The tax incentives in the bill total $14.5 billion with the major
recipients being oil, natural gas, coal and nuclear power producers
with renewable energy and energy efficiency receiving a much smaller
share of the incentives. Also included are $1.13 billion in incentives
for alternative-fuel and hybrid-electric vehicles as part of the
CLEAR Act (see related
story) championed by Senator Orrin Hatch
(R-UT). Consumer tax credits for purchase of alternative-fueled
or hybrid vehicles, purchase of alternative fuel as well as purchase
and installation of alternative fueling equipment would now be eligible
for tax incentives. The existing biodiesel production tax credit
is also extended from 2006 to 2008. The credit provides biodiesel
producers with $1.00 per gallon of agri-biodiesel (including
animal fats) produced and $.50
per gallon of "regular" biodiesel (from waste grease).
For
the first time ever, the energy bill requires the use of renewable
fuels like ethanol and biodiesel. The RFS sets a national usage
requirement starting at 4 billion gallons in 2006 and increasing
to 7.5 billion gallons in 2012. The RFS will provide a boost to
the domestic renewable fuels market and help facilitate increased
petroleum displacement in the transportation sector while providing
environmental, energy security and economic benefits to communities.
However,
the bill fails to address fuel economy in automobiles. In 2005,
oil imports hit record highs at 10.8 million barrels per day; the
transportation sector uses more than two-thirds of the oil consumed
in the United States. Efforts to strengthen fuel economy standards have
proven to be politically unpopular and repeatedly scuttled. As a
result efficiency has remained largely unaddressed while gasoline
prices continue to rise. The Administration recently unveiled a
proposal to increase fuel economy requirements in light trucks/SUVS
by a very small amount.
The bill also contains several clean transportation provisions including
efforts to tighten alternative fuel use requirements for government
fleets; a competitive grant pilot program for the purchase of alternative-fueled vehicles or
hybrids; fuel cell and clean school bus programs;
a diesel emissions reduction program to provide funds for the retrofit
and replacement of heavy duty vehicles like trucks and buses; as
well as provisions to reduce long-duration idling of heavy duty
vehicles.
UPDATE OF EPACT FLEET REQUIREMENTS
The
new Energy Bill now requires the dual-fueled vehicles operated by
government fleets to operate on alternative fuel unless granted a
waiver by the Department of Energy (DOE). This
clarifies requirements under the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (PL No:
102-486) which mandated a certain percentage of alternative-fueled
vehicles in government fleets. Earlier,
fleets could earn credits for using dual-fuel vehicles operated
primarily on petroleum because there was no specific requirement
that the fleet actually use alternative fuel in the dual-fuel
vehicle.
ADVANCED
VEHICLES PILOT PROGRAM
The bill establishes a competitive grant pilot program for the purchase
of alternative fueled vehicles, fuel cell vehicles or hybrids to
be administered through DOE’s Clean Cities Program. The program
provides for a 50 percent federal cost share, and both light and
heavy duty vehicles including buses would be eligible. The bill
authorizes $200 million until expended.
FUEL
CELL SCHOOL BUSES DEMONSTRATION
A new program is authorized at $25 million over 4 years for DOE
partnerships with private sector developers of fuel cell school
buses and local governments operating natural gas school buses to
develop and demonstrate fuel cell-powered school buses.
CLEAN
SCHOOL BUS PROGRAM
School buses received an additional boost with the creation of a
competitive school bus grant program to replace the oldest school
buses and retrofit existing buses (including re-powering, after treatment and re-manufactured
engines) . Replacement school buses must operate solely
on ultra-low sulfur diesel or alternative fuel. Eligible alternative
fuels include biodiesel, 85 percent ethanol (E-85), liquefied natural gas
(LNG), compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied petroleum gas (LPG),
propane, and hydrogen. The program places priority on the replacement
of the oldest school buses and the retrofit of existing buses with
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or California Air Resources
Board (CARB) verified technologies. Biodiesel is an EPA verified
retrofit technology. The program is authorized at $55 million per
year for 2006 and 2007.
REDUCTION OF ENGINE IDLING
The bill establishes an Idle Reduction and Energy Conservation Deployment
Program in partnership with EPA’s SmartWay Program and the Department
of Transportation. Eligible technologies include truck stop electrification,
auxiliary power units or any other idle reduction technology used
in heavy-duty vehicles. The program is authorized at $94.5 million
from 2006-2008 for heavy duty trucks, and $45 million from 2006-2008
for locomotives
DIESEL EMISSIONS REDUCTION
A new competitive grants and loan-based program is established through
the EPA to retrofit and replace medium and heavy-duty vehicles.
The provisions in this section are part of the Diesel Emissions
Reductions Act of 2005 (DERA) offered by Senator George V. Voinovich
(R-OH) (see related
story) as an amendment to the Energy Bill. The
program is authorized at $200 million annually for national and
state grant and loan programs to support the voluntary retrofit
of existing diesel engines with EPA or CARB-verified technologies
like particulate matter filters, diesel oxidation catalysts and
alternative fuels like biodiesel. Seventy percent of the funds would
be distributed by EPA, while 20 percent will be available to states
for development of retrofit programs. The program primarily targets
areas with poor air quality and places priority on the cleanup
of public fleets, projects designed to improve public health, and
cost-effective, innovative technologies.
 |
|
Senate
to Consider Transportation Appropriations After Recess
When Congress returns from recess in the
beginning of September, it will turn its attention towards Fiscal
Year (FY) 2006 Transportation Appropriations Bill. The
House has already approved FY 2006 transportation spending as part
of the Transportation, Treasury, the Judiciary and HUD
Appropriations Bill (H.R 3058). Included
in the House spending bill is $8.48
billion for transit programs. This marks an $836 million
increase in funding over FY’05 levels. Amtrak
passenger rail received a boost with the House voting overwhelmingly
to keep funding for Amtrak. A floor amendment offered by
Representatives Steven LaTourette (R-OH) and James Oberstar (D-MN)
to increase funding for Amtrak to $1.176 billion passed easily by
voice vote. Earlier, the House Appropriations Committee had voted to
keep Amtrak funding at $550 million, a figure likely to have
triggered the shut down of Amtrak. The Administration’s budget
proposal proposed just $350 million for Amtrak, a cut of almost $1.2
billion.
House
members also voted to remove language in the bill that would have
eliminated all long distance Amtrak routes.
On the Senate side, the Transportation, Treasury,
the Judiciary and HUD Appropriations Bill passed out of full
committee on July 21, 2005. The Senate will complete action on the
bill in September.
The Senate bill includes
$8.2 billion for transit, which
is $427 million over the Administration request of $7.78 billion
and $562 million above FY’05 enacted levels. Amtrak is also
funded at a level of $1.4 billion.
The
Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta has indicated that the President
is likely to veto a spending bill that contains funding for Amtrak
unless there are provisions calling for significant restructuring.
The Administration FY ‘06 request had nearly zeroed out funding
for the nation’s passenger rail service and has repeatedly
called for Amtrak reform.
Also
included in the Senate version is a requirement for $2.3 billion
to be rescinded in 2006 from highway programs from core program funds
including CMAQ which is a principal source of clean transportation
funds. The rescission amount for FY 2005 for highway programs was
$1.2 billion. In the past, states with poor air quality have used
CMAQ funds disproportionately to comply with rescission directives.
EESI will monitor the FY 2006 highway rescission and provide guidance
to stakeholders on how to ensure fair treatment of CMAQ funds in
the rescissions process.
In
related news, the Senate agreed to an amendment offered by Senator
Orrin Hatch (R-UT) to restore funding to the DOE Clean Cities program
in the Energy and Water Appropriations Bill (H.R.2419). The Senate
Appropriations Committee had earlier voted to slash funding for
the program by almost half to $6.5 million, but Senator Hatch who
is a strong supporter of the program offered a floor amendment to
restore funding to $10.6 million. The House voted to cut funding
for the program to $7 million; the Administration request is
for only $6.5 million. The Clean Cities program, with more than 80
Clean Cities Coalitions, is a vital effort to increase the deployment of
clean transportation across the country.
For more information on these appropriations bills, please see:
http://thomas.loc.gov/
Enter
bill number - H.R. 3058 for Transportation, Treasury, the Judiciary
and HUD Appropriations
H.R.2419 for Energy and Water Appropriations

|
| 
|
|
Gasoline Hybrid Buses Join Long Beach Fleet
Long
Beach Transit Agency pressed into service 27 brand new gasoline-electric
hybrid buses in July 2005, marking yet another effort by the city
to clean up its transportation sector. The 40-foot buses, dubbed
“E-Power”, are manufactured by New Flyer Industries
and are equipped with ISE Corp.’s hybrid drivetrain. The buses
offer substantial emissions reductions, including particulate matter
emissions which are below measurable limits and lowered nitrogen
oxide emissions, which will help address some of the air pollution
problems the City of Long Beach struggles with.
The
transit agency, which provides services to 27 million passengers
annually, plans to introduce 20 more hybrid buses by the end of
the summer with the option to purchase 20 each year for the next
four years. The buses were purchased at a cost of $550,000 each,
with funding from local, state and federal sources. Congresswoman
Juanita Millender-McDonald (D-CA) was instrumental in helping the
agency secure federal funding for the project. Other transit agencies
in California including Orange County Transportation Authority,
Gardena Municipal Bus Lines, Montebello Bus Lines and Norwalk Transit
will also be adding gasoline-electric hybrids to their fleets.
For
more information on these buses, go to:
http://www.isecorp.com/ise_products_services/gasoline_hybrid_drive_system/

|
|
CARB
Strikes Pollution Deal with Railroad Companies
The
California Air Resources Board (CARB) has entered into a pollution
reduction agreement with Union Pacific Railroad and Burlington Northern
Santa Fe (BNSF) Railways, two of the largest railroad companies
in the state. The agreement is expected to result in a 20 percent
reduction in locomotive-related diesel particulate matter near rail
yards. Elements of the plan include: 1) An agreement to phase out
non-essential idling within six months and the installation of idle
reduction devices within the next three years; 2) Repair locomotives
with excessive smoke emissions; 3) Maximize the use of ultra-low
sulfur diesel by January 1, 2007; 4) Conduct health risk assessments
for 17 major rail yards and prepare a mitigation plan.
However,
the plan has met with skepticism from local air quality regulators,
environmental groups and community leaders who contend it was drawn
up without public debate. They argue that a provision in the plan
allows railroad companies to walk away from clean up efforts if
local regulatory agencies pass stricter controls. The agreement
comes as California lawmakers are getting set to consider three
bills to curtail railroad pollution. Critics also fear that the
agreement may render the Los Angeles “No Net Increase”
plan (see related story) to prevent port pollution less effective.
Union Pacific and BNSF are the major railroads serving the port.
CARB counters that the agreement offers California the opportunity
to make emission cuts in the railroad sector which is largely
regulated by federal agencies. Idling locomotives and other rail
yard equipment contribute significantly to smog forming emissions
in southern California, especially in San Bernardino county and
Los Angeles.
For
more information on the CARB Railroad agreement, see:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/railyard/080805moufs.pdf

|
| Fuel
Cell Buses Debut in Beijing
Beijing
stepped up efforts to clean up transportation-related air pollution
in the city with a plan to introduce three fuel cell buses. The
buses which will be pressed into service in September 2005 were
delivered to a DaimlerChrysler AG facility in China. The Mercedes-Benz
Citaro buses are equipped with a 205 kW Ballard Power Systems’
fuel cell engine and are part of a fuel cell demonstration project
in China to test the durability of fuel cell technology.
The
project which runs through October 2007 includes the following
partners: 1) DaimlerChrysler AG, 2) the Chinese Ministry of Science
and Technology (MOST), 3) Beijing Public Transport Corporation (BPTC),
which is one of the largest transit authorities in the world operating
around 17,000 buses, 4) British Petroleum (BP), the hydrogen supplier,
and 5) Sinohytech, which will produce the hydrogen. The project will
be monitored by Tsinghua University in Beijing and is funded in
part by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The European
Commission is also participating in the project to ensure integration
with the European Union’s Fuel Cell Bus Project (CUTE) which
involves 30 fuel cell demonstration projects in 10 European cities.
More
information available at:
http://www.fair-pr.com/china2004/press/22-China-Bus.PDF

|
| San
Diego Adds More CNG Buses
San
Diego recently added 103 compressed natural gas (CNG) buses to its
fleets at San Diego Transit and North County Transit District (NCTD).
The buses are powered by Cummins Westport’s 8.3 liter C Gas
Plus engines and offer lowered emissions of particulate matter and
nitrogen oxides.
NCTD
which received a total of 56 new buses now operates 79 CNG buses
which make up approximately 50 percent of the fleet. San Diego Transit
also received 47 new compressed natural gas buses (CNG) in June
2005, the first new additions to its fleet in over 15 years. Manufactured
by New Flyer Industries, the 40-foot CNG buses cost approximately
$350,000 each. The purchase was facilitated by federal, state and
local grants.
More
information available at:
http://www.cumminswestport.com/corporate/newsdetail.php?id=278&return_to=press.php

|
| Hybrid
Buses Coming to
Evansville
Transit
in
Evansville
,
Indiana
just got a little cleaner. The Works Board recently approved a
proposal by Metropolitan Evansville Transit System to purchase 5
diesel-electric hybrids over the next year.
The are buses manufactured by Gillig Corp. and house
GM-Allison’s hybrid drivetrain.
The buses have a price tag of $439,565 each, but federal and
state grants have covered 90 percent of the costs. The
transit agency will have the option to purchase 21 more hybrids
through 2010 if they are satisfied with the buses.

|
|
Japan
Demonstrating Gas-to-Liquid Diesel Hybrid Bus
Japanese
manufacturers Toyota Tsusho Corp., Showa Shell Sekiyu, JR Tokai Bus
Company, and Shell International Gas have partnered to demonstrate
the world’s first gas-to-liquid (GTL) diesel hybrid bus. The
bus will operate for two months transporting passengers to the 2005
World Exposition at Aichi as well as commuters in
Seto
City
and
Kasugai
City
.
The
bus uses
Toyota
and Hino Motors Corp.’s parallel hybrid system and is powered by a
6-cylinder low-emission diesel engine with an electronically
controlled high-pressure common rail injection system. The hybrid
system helps improve fuel consumption by 10-20 percent and reduce CO2
emissions by 9-17 percent over existing diesel
vehicles.
Shell International
Gas will provide the GTL Fuel made from natural gas by the Fischer-Tropsch
GTL cracking process. The
fuel is colorless, odorless and cleaner than conventional diesel
fuel. It is virtually free of sulfur and aromatics.
For
more information on this demonstration project go to:
http://www.toyotsu.co.jp/Press/05072701.cfm

|
 |
|
LA
Port Task Force Delivers Clean Up Plan
The
Los Angeles Port Air Quality Task Force finally submitted its “No
Net Increase” plan to curtail port-related emissions in the
LA area to outgoing Mayor James Hahn on June 29. The 603-page report
identifies 68 control measures to decrease air emissions from ships,
harbor craft, rail operations, cargo terminal equipment and trucks
operating in the Port and throughout the region.
The
report is the result of nine months of extensive analysis and deliberations
by the 21-member task force appointed by the Mayor to find ways
to decrease port pollution in the area. In recent years, the LA-Long
Beach Port complex has emerged as the single largest air polluter
in the region, producing nearly 20,000 tons of nitrogen oxides,
and 1000 tons of particulates in 2001. The port complex, which is
the largest in the country, has experienced a surge in economic
trade resulting in soaring diesel emissions. The report states that
since 2001 particulate matter emissions from the ports have increased
64 percent and nitrogen oxide emissions by almost 42 percent. In
the absence of pollution controls, port pollution is expected to
rise significantly.
Some
of the major initiatives recommended by the task force include a
proposal to replace older trucks at the port with cleaner models,
introduce ultra-low sulfur diesel in ships, and install electric
power sources for ships docked at the port or idling near shore.
The plan is expected to result in significant health benefits including
2,200 fewer premature deaths by 2025 and billions in health care
cost savings as a result of improved air quality.
However,
the plan is not without its critics. Industry officials have complained
that the $10-15 billion price tag for implementation of the plan
is not feasible. Environmentalists argue that the health cost savings
projected at almost $20 billion makes the expenditure well worth
the price. Critics also contend that the 20-year timeline of the
plan will do little to reduce emissions in the short term. Regardless,
the plan represents an important first step for the Los Angeles
area effort to clean up port and goods-related emissions.
More
information on the plan available at:
http://www.lacity.org/portofla/press/portoflapress31030704_06292005.pdf

|
|  |
|
Studies
Indicate Poor Air Quality May Increase Mortality
Three
separate independent analyses commissioned by the US Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) indicate that even small increases in ozone
pollution may raise the risk of mortality. The studies, which were
conducted by researchers at the New York University School of Medicine,
Harvard School of Public Health and the Yale University School of
Forestry and Environmental Studies, represent the first attempt
by the EPA to quantify the risk posed by ozone to public health.
One
set of researchers used data from 14 US cities, 13 Canadian cities,
and 21 European cities. Another study used the data from the Morbidity
and Mortality Air Pollution Study (NMMAPS) study of 95 cities together
with European studies, while the third was smaller in scope, using
data from seven US cities plus other worldwide data for various parts
of the analysis. Although the three studies used different data
sets and slightly different approaches, they were able to find “strong
evidence of a short-term association between increases in ozone
and mortality.” Two of the three studies found that small
increases of 10 parts per billion in ozone resulted in increased
mortality by 0.85 percent over the next couple of days following
the increase.
The
results of the studies come as EPA is evaluating and preparing to
possibly revise the national air quality standard for ozone. The
current national 8-hour standard for ozone is 0.08 parts per million
(ppm) but researchers, scientists and health professionals are concerned
that the current standard does not adequately protect public heath.
The new standard is due by December 2006.
More
information on these three scientific analyses is available in the July
issue of Epidemiology
http://www.epidem.com/

|
|
 |
|  |
| CARB
Public Hearing on Amendments to Fleet Rule
September
15-16, 2005, 9:00 a.m.
South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium
21865 E. Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, California 91765
The
California Air Resources Board (CARB) will conduct a public meeting
to consider adoption of amendments to the exhaust emission standards
and test procedures for urban bus engines and vehicles and to the
CARB Fleet Rule for transit agencies. The purpose of these amendments
is to achieve emission reductions from the operations of transit
agencies throughout the state, and to make changes in the regulations
to specifically address transit vehicles used in the South Coast
Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Also under consideration
will be amendments related to regulations governing diesel particulate
control measures for solid waste collection vehicles and regulations
for school buses in SCAQMD.
More
information is available at:
Transit Vehicles - http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/sctransit/notice.pdf
Solid Waste Collection Vehicles - http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/scswcv05/notice.pdf
School Buses -http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/scschl05/notice.pdf

|
|  |
| Biodiesel
Utilization Workshop and Production Workshop 2005
September 15-16, 2005
Centre on the Grove
Boise, Idaho
A
Biodiesel Utilization and
Biodiesel Production Workshops will be held by the University of
Idaho in partnership with the US Department of Agriculture to share
information about biodiesel, its utilization and production.
The objectives for the consecutive workshops are to:
•
Share up-to-date information about the health and air quality of
biodiesel benefits
• Inform the public about the procedures needed to ensure a
successful experience using biodiesel
• Explain biodiesel production, availability and use with
operators of school bus, urban truck
and
other diesel fleets
• Have decision-makers share the barriers to increased biodiesel
usage by their fleets and discuss solutions
• Cover other related issues such as biodiesel supply, storage
issues, warranties and Federal incentives
School
board members, school administrators, those involved with fuel
purchasing, operating and maintaining bus fleets, parents, or others
concerned with children’s exposure to hazardous air pollutants are
especially invited to register for these workshops. Scholarships
available to school district personnel to encourage attendance.
More
information is available at:
http://www.uidaho.edu/bioenergy/conferencespg2.htm

|
|
|
Hybrid
Truck Users Forum (HTUF) 5th National Meeting
October 19-21, 2005
Toledo
,
Ohio
WestStart
CALSTART and the
U.S
.
Army
National
Automotive
Center
(NAC) will hold a HTUF National Meeting, hosted by Dana Corporation.
HTUF is a national,
multi-year, user-driven program to assist the commercialization of
heavy-duty hybrid technologies. It
is operated by WestStart-CALSTART and the U.S. Army’s National
Automotive Center (NAC). HTUF
works to find applications and generate demand for hybrid vehicles
in the commercial market to help speed the development and reduce
the cost of such vehicles.
For
more information, please see:
http://www.calstart.org/programs/htuf/index.php?p=programs

|
| 
|
| EESI’s
National Clean Bus Project is eager to learn about your clean bus
fleet. If you are in the process of procurement, or if you already
operate buses that produce fewer emissions and consume less fuel than
conventional diesel buses, let us know if we haven’t heard –
and told -- your story! Provide (1) the name of your organization
and primary contact person; (2) type of bus engine, fuel, and other
emission control devices used; (3) number of buses; (4) funding sources;
(5) costs and benefits; (6) and lessons learned. We’ll post
this information on our website and include it in future editions
of the Clean Bus Update! Send this information to Shefali Ranganathan
at sranganathan@eesi.org
or call 202-662-1883. More information can be mailed to 122
C St., NW, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20001. |
| The
Clean Bus Update is a monthly periodical providing an overview of
current program and policy activities related to the deployment of
low-polluting, energy-efficient buses in the United States. Topics
include technology developments, clean vehicle deployment, energy
consumption, the environment, government policy, and public health.
The National Clean Bus Network is an informal coalition of public
and private sector organizations working to increase the use of cleaner
bus technologies and fuels. The National Clean Bus Network is a free
resource to all clean bus stakeholders. If there are issues we are
missing and you think we should cover, please let us know. |
| 
|
T he Clean Bus Update
is sponsored by the State Energy Office, North Carolina Department
of Administration and the U.S Department of Energy, with State Energy
Program funds, in cooperation with North Carolina State University
Industrial Extension Service. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions,
or recommendations expressed herein are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect the views of either the State Energy Office,
North Carolina Department of Administration, or the U.S Department
of Energy. |
|
To unsubscribe from the Clean Bus Update click HERE.
If your address changes please let us know so that we may keep our
records updated. If there are others who should receive the Update,
please send their contact information.
CLICK HERE FOR PRINT VERSION
|
|