The Transportation Bill is Finally a Reality

On August 10, 2005, President Bush signed into law the massive transportation bill "Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy For Users" (SAFETEA-LU), which authorizes $286.5 billion in guaranteed funding over six years for federal highways and transit programs. SAFETEA-LU marks a 30 percent increase in funding over the $218 billion Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) (PL No: 105-178) legislation that expired September 30, 2003. The long delayed reauthorization also includes $52.6 billion in transit funding, up almost 46 percent from levels guaranteed in TEA-21, and several provisions for clean buses. Negotiations over the transportation reauthorization bill were stalled over disagreements on funding and other provisions for almost 2 years resulting in 12 extensions before the legislators managed to find common ground this year. Faced with the prospect of further extensions, the House and Senate reached a compromise late in July and rushed to send a bill to the President before the start of August recess.

Significant changes in the new law include a change in the rate of return for ‘donor’ states that will now see an increased rate of return up to 92 percent in 2008 from the current rate of 90.5 percent. Donor states are states contributing more taxes to the Highway Trust Fund, the principal source of funds for highway and transit programs, than they receive in return as highway program dollars. This issue was a major point of contention in deliberations over the bill in the last two years with ‘donor” states hoping to see the level of return rise to 95 percent.

Some of the key clean bus-related provisions in SAFETEA-LU include: 1) the reauthorization of the Clean Fuels Program, 2) modest increases in funding for the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program as well as expanded project eligibility, 3) a new Clean School Bus program as well as 4) increased funding for the Fuel Cell Bus program. In addition, there are several clean bus earmarks as well as increased funding under the formula grants programs (Urbanized Areas, Non-Urbanized Areas, Special Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities) which can be used to purchase cleaner buses.

CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ)
The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program received a small increase in funding to $8.6 billion over five years in comparison to $8.5 billion in TEA-21 over six years. Several changes have been incorporated in the program including:

  • Expanded eligibility to include areas which are “maintenance” or in “non-attainment” of the national air quality standard for PM2.5 (fine particulate matter), for funding. In December 2004, 208 counties were listed to be in non-attainment of the PM2.5 standard. The inclusion of PM2.5 “maintenance” or “non-attainment” areas means that additional areas will now be eligible for CMAQ funding. In addition, most counties in non-attainment of the PM2.5 standard are also in non-attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard. This creates a situation whereby areas are battling the twin problems of particulate matter and ozone pollution while the available CMAQ funds remain largely the same.

  • Expansion of project eligibility to include:
       a. Advanced truck stop electrification systems.
       b. Purchase of integrated, interoperable emergency communications equipment.
       c. Purchase of diesel retrofits for non-road vehicles and engines in construction projects located in non-attainment areas (ozone, PM10, PM2.5).
       d. Outreach activities to provide information and technical assistance to the owners and operators 
      for diesel equipment and vehicles regarding the purchase and installation of diesel retrofits.
  • States receiving minimum apportionment would also be able to fund projects that would be eligible in areas that are maintenance or non-attainment areas for ozone, PM10 and PM2.5.
  • Requires maintenance and non-attainment areas to place priority of use on:
       a. Diesel retrofits - Eligible retrofits include US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or California Air Resources Board (CARB) verified technologies. Biodiesel is an EPA-verified retrofit     
       technology.
       b. Cost-effective strategies and,
       c. Technologies that improve public health.
  • Directs the US Department of Transportation to maintain a database of CMAQ projects with information on the impacts of these projects.
  • Allows flexibility for certain states (Montana, Maine and Oregon) to use CMAQ funds for the operation of public transit and passenger rail services.
  • Also allows Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio to use CMAQ funds for the purchase of biodiesel or other alternative fuels. This provision is different from earlier versions of the bill which allowed all states receiving CMAQ funds to purchase biodiesel.

CLEAN FUELS GRANT PROGRAM
The Clean Fuels Grant Program which provides funding for clean bus projects has also been reauthorized in SAFETEA-LU at the level of $238.1 million over five years. This is a significant cut in funding when compared to TEA-21 which was authorized at $100 million per year. The Clean Fuels Program was essentially an unfunded mandate in TEA-21 because of significant delays in rulemaking by the US Department of Transportation and failure to appropriate money for the program.

The new provisions in the program include changes in the funding mechanism from formula based to discretionary grants. Federal match for projects also increases from 80 percent to 90 percent. The Clean Fuels Grant Program is a critical funding source for clean bus purchases, and EESI will work with other clean bus stakeholders to ensure that funds are appropriated for this program.

CLEAN SCHOOL BUS PROGRAM
For the first time ever, SAFETEA-LU establishes a Clean School Bus Program. The program is authorized at $55 million in 2005 and 2006 with grants being awarded on a competitive basis for the replacement of the oldest school buses, retrofit of existing buses and purchase of alternative fuels including biodiesel. Federal cost share for the purchase of retrofit devices is 100 percent and 25-50 percent for the replacement of buses.

FUEL CELL BUS PROGRAM
SAFETEA-LU also provides funding for a fuel cell bus research and development program at the level of $49 million over 4 years starting in 2006. The program is designed to accelerate commercial deployment of fuel cell buses through technology development. EESI is a member of the National Fuel Cell Bus Technology Initiative, which is comprised of 30 leading bus manufacturers, technology providers, and operators.

RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED PROGRAM FUNDS
Included in SAFETEA-LU is a provision requiring states to return a portion of unobligated highway program funds on September 30, 2009, the day SAFETEA-LU expires. The provision calls for $8.543 billion in rescissions from core program funds including CMAQ which is a principal source of clean transportation funds. Rescissions occur on an annual basis with $1.2 billion being rescinded in 2005 (see related EESI action alert). However, in the past, states with poor air quality have used CMAQ funds disproportionately to comply with rescission directives. EESI will continue to monitor these rescissions and provide guidance to stakeholders on how to ensure fair treatment of CMAQ funds in the rescissions process.

  President Signs Energy Bill

In an effort to advance the first comprehensive energy policy in 13 years, Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (H.R 6) which was then signed into law by the President on August 8, 2005. The Energy bill which has been several years in the making contains billions of dollars in tax incentives, a Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), and several provisions for increasing cleaner transportation alternatives but does little to reduce oil consumption in the transportation sector.

The tax incentives in the bill total $14.5 billion with the major recipients being oil, natural gas, coal and nuclear power producers with renewable energy and energy efficiency receiving a much smaller share of the incentives. Also included are $1.13 billion in incentives for alternative-fuel and hybrid-electric vehicles as part of the CLEAR Act (see related story) championed by Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT). Consumer tax credits for purchase of alternative-fueled or hybrid vehicles, purchase of alternative fuel as well as purchase and installation of alternative fueling equipment would now be eligible for tax incentives. The existing biodiesel production tax credit is also extended from 2006 to 2008. The credit provides biodiesel producers with $1.00 per gallon of agri-biodiesel (including animal fats) produced and $.50 per gallon of "regular" biodiesel (from waste grease).

For the first time ever, the energy bill requires the use of renewable fuels like ethanol and biodiesel. The RFS sets a national usage requirement starting at 4 billion gallons in 2006 and increasing to 7.5 billion gallons in 2012. The RFS will provide a boost to the domestic renewable fuels market and help facilitate increased petroleum displacement in the transportation sector while providing environmental, energy security and economic benefits to communities.

However, the bill fails to address fuel economy in automobiles. In 2005, oil imports hit record highs at 10.8 million barrels per day; the transportation sector uses more than two-thirds of the oil consumed in the United States. Efforts to strengthen fuel economy standards have proven to be politically unpopular and repeatedly scuttled. As a result efficiency has remained largely unaddressed while gasoline prices continue to rise. The Administration recently unveiled a proposal to increase fuel economy requirements in light trucks/SUVS by a very small amount.

The bill also contains several clean transportation provisions including efforts to tighten alternative fuel use requirements for government fleets; a competitive grant pilot program for the purchase of alternative-fueled vehicles or hybrids; fuel cell and clean school bus programs; a diesel emissions reduction program to provide funds for the retrofit and replacement of heavy duty vehicles like trucks and buses; as well as provisions to reduce long-duration idling of heavy duty vehicles.

UPDATE OF EPACT FLEET REQUIREMENTS

The new Energy Bill now requires the dual-fueled vehicles operated by government fleets to operate on alternative fuel unless granted a waiver by the Department of Energy (DOE).  This clarifies requirements under the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (PL No: 102-486) which mandated a certain percentage of alternative-fueled vehicles in government fleets.  Earlier, fleets could earn credits for using dual-fuel vehicles operated primarily on petroleum because there was no specific requirement that the fleet actually use alternative fuel in the dual-fuel vehicle.

ADVANCED VEHICLES PILOT PROGRAM
The bill establishes a competitive grant pilot program for the purchase of alternative fueled vehicles, fuel cell vehicles or hybrids to be administered through DOE’s Clean Cities Program. The program provides for a 50 percent federal cost share, and both light and heavy duty vehicles including buses would be eligible. The bill authorizes $200 million until expended.

FUEL CELL SCHOOL BUSES DEMONSTRATION
A new program is authorized at $25 million over 4 years for DOE partnerships with private sector developers of fuel cell school buses and local governments operating natural gas school buses to develop and demonstrate fuel cell-powered school buses.

CLEAN SCHOOL BUS PROGRAM
School buses received an additional boost with the creation of a competitive school bus grant program to replace the oldest school buses and retrofit existing buses (including re-powering, after treatment and re-manufactured engines) . Replacement school buses must operate solely on ultra-low sulfur diesel or alternative fuel. Eligible alternative fuels include biodiesel, 85 percent ethanol (E-85), liquefied natural gas (LNG), compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), propane, and hydrogen. The program places priority on the replacement of the oldest school buses and the retrofit of existing buses with US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or California Air Resources Board (CARB) verified technologies. Biodiesel is an EPA verified retrofit technology. The program is authorized at $55 million per year for 2006 and 2007.

REDUCTION OF ENGINE IDLING

The bill establishes an Idle Reduction and Energy Conservation Deployment Program in partnership with EPA’s SmartWay Program and the Department of Transportation. Eligible technologies include truck stop electrification, auxiliary power units or any other idle reduction technology used in heavy-duty vehicles. The program is authorized at $94.5 million from 2006-2008 for heavy duty trucks, and $45 million from 2006-2008 for locomotives

DIESEL EMISSIONS REDUCTION
A new competitive grants and loan-based program is established through the EPA to retrofit and replace medium and heavy-duty vehicles. The provisions in this section are part of the Diesel Emissions Reductions Act of 2005 (DERA) offered by Senator George V. Voinovich (R-OH) (see related story) as an amendment to the Energy Bill. The program is authorized at $200 million annually for national and state grant and loan programs to support the voluntary retrofit of existing diesel engines with EPA or CARB-verified technologies like particulate matter filters, diesel oxidation catalysts and alternative fuels like biodiesel. Seventy percent of the funds would be distributed by EPA, while 20 percent will be available to states for development of retrofit programs. The program primarily targets areas with poor air quality and places priority on the cleanup of public fleets, projects designed to improve public health, and cost-effective, innovative technologies.


 Senate to Consider Transportation Appropriations After Recess

When Congress returns from recess in the beginning of September, it will turn its attention towards Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Transportation Appropriations Bill.  The House has already approved FY 2006 transportation spending as part of the Transportation, Treasury, the Judiciary and HUD Appropriations Bill (H.R 3058).  Included in the House spending bill is $8.48 billion for transit programs. This marks an $836 million increase in funding over FY’05 levels.  Amtrak passenger rail received a boost with the House voting overwhelmingly to keep funding for Amtrak. A floor amendment offered by Representatives Steven LaTourette (R-OH) and James Oberstar (D-MN) to increase funding for Amtrak to $1.176 billion passed easily by voice vote. Earlier, the House Appropriations Committee had voted to keep Amtrak funding at $550 million, a figure likely to have triggered the shut down of Amtrak. The Administration’s budget proposal proposed just $350 million for Amtrak, a cut of almost $1.2 billion. House members also voted to remove language in the bill that would have eliminated all long distance Amtrak routes. 

On the Senate side, the Transportation, Treasury, the Judiciary and HUD Appropriations Bill passed out of full committee on July 21, 2005. The Senate will complete action on the bill in September.  The Senate bill includes $8.2 billion for transit, which is $427 million over the Administration request of $7.78 billion and $562 million above FY’05 enacted levels. Amtrak is also funded at a level of $1.4 billion.

The Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta has indicated that the President is likely to veto a spending bill that contains funding for Amtrak unless there are provisions calling for significant restructuring. The Administration FY ‘06 request had nearly zeroed out funding for the nation’s passenger rail service and has repeatedly called for Amtrak reform.

Also included in the Senate version is a requirement for $2.3 billion to be rescinded in 2006 from highway programs from core program funds including CMAQ which is a principal source of clean transportation funds. The rescission amount for FY 2005 for highway programs was $1.2 billion. In the past, states with poor air quality have used CMAQ funds disproportionately to comply with rescission directives. EESI will monitor the FY 2006 highway rescission and provide guidance to stakeholders on how to ensure fair treatment of CMAQ funds in the rescissions process.

In related news, the Senate agreed to an amendment offered by Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) to restore funding to the DOE Clean Cities program in the Energy and Water Appropriations Bill (H.R.2419). The Senate Appropriations Committee had earlier voted to slash funding for the program by almost half to $6.5 million, but Senator Hatch who is a strong supporter of the program offered a floor amendment to restore funding to $10.6 million. The House voted to cut funding for the program to $7 million; the Administration request is for only $6.5 million. The Clean Cities program, with more than 80 Clean Cities Coalitions, is a vital effort to increase the deployment of clean transportation across the country.

For more information on these appropriations bills, please see:
http://thomas.loc.gov/
Enter bill number - H.R. 3058 for Transportation, Treasury, the Judiciary and HUD Appropriations
H.R.2419 for Energy and Water Appropriations

  Gasoline Hybrid Buses Join Long Beach Fleet

Long Beach Transit Agency pressed into service 27 brand new gasoline-electric hybrid buses in July 2005, marking yet another effort by the city to clean up its transportation sector. The 40-foot buses, dubbed “E-Power”, are manufactured by New Flyer Industries and are equipped with ISE Corp.’s hybrid drivetrain. The buses offer substantial emissions reductions, including particulate matter emissions which are below measurable limits and lowered nitrogen oxide emissions, which will help address some of the air pollution problems the City of Long Beach struggles with.

The transit agency, which provides services to 27 million passengers annually, plans to introduce 20 more hybrid buses by the end of the summer with the option to purchase 20 each year for the next four years. The buses were purchased at a cost of $550,000 each, with funding from local, state and federal sources. Congresswoman Juanita Millender-McDonald (D-CA) was instrumental in helping the agency secure federal funding for the project. Other transit agencies in California including Orange County Transportation Authority, Gardena Municipal Bus Lines, Montebello Bus Lines and Norwalk Transit will also be adding gasoline-electric hybrids to their fleets.

For more information on these buses, go to:
http://www.isecorp.com/ise_products_services/gasoline_hybrid_drive_system/

 CARB Strikes Pollution Deal with Railroad Companies

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has entered into a pollution reduction agreement with Union Pacific Railroad and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railways, two of the largest railroad companies in the state. The agreement is expected to result in a 20 percent reduction in locomotive-related diesel particulate matter near rail yards. Elements of the plan include: 1) An agreement to phase out non-essential idling within six months and the installation of idle reduction devices within the next three years; 2) Repair locomotives with excessive smoke emissions; 3) Maximize the use of ultra-low sulfur diesel by January 1, 2007; 4) Conduct health risk assessments for 17 major rail yards and prepare a mitigation plan.

However, the plan has met with skepticism from local air quality regulators, environmental groups and community leaders who contend it was drawn up without public debate. They argue that a provision in the plan allows railroad companies to walk away from clean up efforts if local regulatory agencies pass stricter controls. The agreement comes as California lawmakers are getting set to consider three bills to curtail railroad pollution. Critics also fear that the agreement may render the Los Angeles “No Net Increase” plan (see related story) to prevent port pollution less effective. Union Pacific and BNSF are the major railroads serving the port. CARB counters that the agreement offers California the opportunity to make emission cuts in the railroad sector which is largely regulated by federal agencies. Idling locomotives and other rail yard equipment contribute significantly to smog forming emissions in southern California, especially in San Bernardino county and Los Angeles.

For more information on the CARB Railroad agreement, see:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/railyard/080805moufs.pdf

 Fuel Cell Buses Debut in Beijing

Beijing stepped up efforts to clean up transportation-related air pollution in the city with a plan to introduce three fuel cell buses. The buses which will be pressed into service in September 2005 were delivered to a DaimlerChrysler AG facility in China. The Mercedes-Benz Citaro buses are equipped with a 205 kW Ballard Power Systems’ fuel cell engine and are part of a fuel cell demonstration project in China to test the durability of fuel cell technology.

The project which runs through October 2007 includes the following partners: 1) DaimlerChrysler AG, 2) the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), 3) Beijing Public Transport Corporation (BPTC), which is one of the largest transit authorities in the world operating around 17,000 buses, 4) British Petroleum (BP), the hydrogen supplier, and 5) Sinohytech, which will produce the hydrogen. The project will be monitored by Tsinghua University in Beijing and is funded in part by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The European Commission is also participating in the project to ensure integration with the European Union’s Fuel Cell Bus Project (CUTE) which involves 30 fuel cell demonstration projects in 10 European cities.

More information available at:
http://www.fair-pr.com/china2004/press/22-China-Bus.PDF

 San Diego Adds More CNG Buses

San Diego recently added 103 compressed natural gas (CNG) buses to its fleets at San Diego Transit and North County Transit District (NCTD). The buses are powered by Cummins Westport’s 8.3 liter C Gas Plus engines and offer lowered emissions of particulate matter and nitrogen oxides.

NCTD which received a total of 56 new buses now operates 79 CNG buses which make up approximately 50 percent of the fleet. San Diego Transit also received 47 new compressed natural gas buses (CNG) in June 2005, the first new additions to its fleet in over 15 years. Manufactured by New Flyer Industries, the 40-foot CNG buses cost approximately $350,000 each. The purchase was facilitated by federal, state and local grants.

More information available at: http://www.cumminswestport.com/corporate/newsdetail.php?id=278&return_to=press.php

 Hybrid Buses Coming to Evansville

Transit in Evansville , Indiana just got a little cleaner. The Works Board recently approved a proposal by Metropolitan Evansville Transit System to purchase 5 diesel-electric hybrids over the next year.  The are buses manufactured by Gillig Corp. and house GM-Allison’s hybrid drivetrain.  The buses have a price tag of $439,565 each, but federal and state grants have covered 90 percent of the costs.  The transit agency will have the option to purchase 21 more hybrids through 2010 if they are satisfied with the buses.

Japan Demonstrating Gas-to-Liquid Diesel Hybrid Bus

Japanese manufacturers Toyota Tsusho Corp., Showa Shell Sekiyu, JR Tokai Bus Company, and Shell International Gas have partnered to demonstrate the world’s first gas-to-liquid (GTL) diesel hybrid bus.  The bus will operate for two months transporting passengers to the 2005 World Exposition at Aichi as well as commuters in Seto City and Kasugai City .

The bus uses Toyota and Hino Motors Corp.’s parallel hybrid system and is powered by a 6-cylinder low-emission diesel engine with an electronically controlled high-pressure common rail injection system. The hybrid system helps improve fuel consumption by 10-20 percent and reduce CO2 emissions by  9-17 percent over existing diesel vehicles.

Shell International Gas will provide the GTL Fuel made from natural gas by the Fischer-Tropsch GTL cracking process.  The fuel is colorless, odorless and cleaner than conventional diesel fuel. It is virtually free of sulfur and aromatics.

For more information on this demonstration project go to:
http://www.toyotsu.co.jp/Press/05072701.cfm


LA Port Task Force Delivers Clean Up Plan

The Los Angeles Port Air Quality Task Force finally submitted its “No Net Increase” plan to curtail port-related emissions in the LA area to outgoing Mayor James Hahn on June 29. The 603-page report identifies 68 control measures to decrease air emissions from ships, harbor craft, rail operations, cargo terminal equipment and trucks operating in the Port and throughout the region.

The report is the result of nine months of extensive analysis and deliberations by the 21-member task force appointed by the Mayor to find ways to decrease port pollution in the area. In recent years, the LA-Long Beach Port complex has emerged as the single largest air polluter in the region, producing nearly 20,000 tons of nitrogen oxides, and 1000 tons of particulates in 2001. The port complex, which is the largest in the country, has experienced a surge in economic trade resulting in soaring diesel emissions. The report states that since 2001 particulate matter emissions from the ports have increased 64 percent and nitrogen oxide emissions by almost 42 percent. In the absence of pollution controls, port pollution is expected to rise significantly.

Some of the major initiatives recommended by the task force include a proposal to replace older trucks at the port with cleaner models, introduce ultra-low sulfur diesel in ships, and install electric power sources for ships docked at the port or idling near shore. The plan is expected to result in significant health benefits including 2,200 fewer premature deaths by 2025 and billions in health care cost savings as a result of improved air quality.

However, the plan is not without its critics. Industry officials have complained that the $10-15 billion price tag for implementation of the plan is not feasible. Environmentalists argue that the health cost savings projected at almost $20 billion makes the expenditure well worth the price. Critics also contend that the 20-year timeline of the plan will do little to reduce emissions in the short term. Regardless, the plan represents an important first step for the Los Angeles area effort to clean up port and goods-related emissions.

More information on the plan available at:
http://www.lacity.org/portofla/press/portoflapress31030704_06292005.pdf

Studies Indicate Poor Air Quality May Increase Mortality

Three separate independent analyses commissioned by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) indicate that even small increases in ozone pollution may raise the risk of mortality. The studies, which were conducted by researchers at the New York University School of Medicine, Harvard School of Public Health and the Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, represent the first attempt by the EPA to quantify the risk posed by ozone to public health.

One set of researchers used data from 14 US cities, 13 Canadian cities, and 21 European cities. Another study used the data from the Morbidity and Mortality Air Pollution Study (NMMAPS) study of 95 cities together with European studies, while the third was smaller in scope, using data from seven US cities plus other worldwide data for various parts of the analysis. Although the three studies used different data sets and slightly different approaches, they were able to find “strong evidence of a short-term association between increases in ozone and mortality.” Two of the three studies found that small increases of 10 parts per billion in ozone resulted in increased mortality by 0.85 percent over the next couple of days following the increase.

The results of the studies come as EPA is evaluating and preparing to possibly revise the national air quality standard for ozone. The current national 8-hour standard for ozone is 0.08 parts per million (ppm) but researchers, scientists and health professionals are concerned that the current standard does not adequately protect public heath. The new standard is due by December 2006.

More information on these three scientific analyses is available in the July issue of Epidemiology
http://www.epidem.com/

CARB Public Hearing on Amendments to Fleet Rule

September 15-16, 2005, 9:00 a.m.
South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium
21865 E. Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, California 91765

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) will conduct a public meeting to consider adoption of amendments to the exhaust emission standards and test procedures for urban bus engines and vehicles and to the CARB Fleet Rule for transit agencies. The purpose of these amendments is to achieve emission reductions from the operations of transit agencies throughout the state, and to make changes in the regulations to specifically address transit vehicles used in the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Also under consideration will be amendments related to regulations governing diesel particulate control measures for solid waste collection vehicles and regulations for school buses in SCAQMD.

More information is available at:
Transit Vehicles - http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/sctransit/notice.pdf
Solid Waste Collection Vehicles - http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/scswcv05/notice.pdf
School Buses -http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/scschl05/notice.pdf


Biodiesel Utilization Workshop and Production Workshop 2005


September 15-16, 2005
Centre on the Grove
Boise, Idaho

 

A Biodiesel Utilization and Biodiesel Production Workshops will be held by the University of Idaho in partnership with the US Department of Agriculture to share information about biodiesel, its utilization and production.

The objectives for the consecutive workshops are to:

• Share up-to-date information about the health and air quality of biodiesel benefits
• Inform the public about the procedures needed to ensure a successful experience using biodiesel
• Explain biodiesel production, availability and use with operators of school bus, urban truck

and other diesel fleets
• Have decision-makers share the barriers to increased biodiesel usage by their fleets and discuss solutions
• Cover other related issues such as biodiesel supply, storage issues, warranties and Federal incentives
 

School board members, school administrators, those involved with fuel purchasing, operating and maintaining bus fleets, parents, or others concerned with children’s exposure to hazardous air pollutants are especially invited to register for these workshops. Scholarships available to school district personnel to encourage attendance.

More information is available at:
http://www.uidaho.edu/bioenergy/conferencespg2.htm


Hybrid Truck Users Forum (HTUF) 5th National Meeting

October 19-21, 2005
Toledo , Ohio

WestStart CALSTART and the U.S . Army National Automotive Center (NAC) will hold a HTUF National Meeting, hosted by Dana Corporation.  HTUF is a national, multi-year, user-driven program to assist the commercialization of heavy-duty hybrid technologies.  It is operated by WestStart-CALSTART and the U.S. Army’s National Automotive Center (NAC).  HTUF works to find applications and generate demand for hybrid vehicles in the commercial market to help speed the development and reduce the cost of such vehicles.

For more information, please see:
http://www.calstart.org/programs/htuf/index.php?p=programs

EESI’s National Clean Bus Project is eager to learn about your clean bus fleet. If you are in the process of procurement, or if you already operate buses that produce fewer emissions and consume less fuel than conventional diesel buses, let us know if we haven’t heard – and told -- your story! Provide (1) the name of your organization and primary contact person; (2) type of bus engine, fuel, and other emission control devices used; (3) number of buses; (4) funding sources; (5) costs and benefits; (6) and lessons learned. We’ll post this information on our website and include it in future editions of the Clean Bus Update! Send this information to Shefali Ranganathan at sranganathan@eesi.org or call 202-662-1883. More information can be mailed to 122 C St., NW, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20001.
The Clean Bus Update is a monthly periodical providing an overview of current program and policy activities related to the deployment of low-polluting, energy-efficient buses in the United States. Topics include technology developments, clean vehicle deployment, energy consumption, the environment, government policy, and public health. The National Clean Bus Network is an informal coalition of public and private sector organizations working to increase the use of cleaner bus technologies and fuels. The National Clean Bus Network is a free resource to all clean bus stakeholders. If there are issues we are missing and you think we should cover, please let us know.

T he Clean Bus Update is sponsored by the State Energy Office, North Carolina Department of Administration and the U.S Department of Energy, with State Energy Program funds, in cooperation with North Carolina State University Industrial Extension Service. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of either the State Energy Office, North Carolina Department of Administration, or the U.S Department of Energy.
To unsubscribe from the Clean Bus Update click HERE.  If your address changes please let us know so that we may keep our records updated. If there are others who should receive the Update, please send their contact information.

CLICK HERE FOR PRINT VERSION