Home  ||  About EESI  ||  Programs  ||  Briefings  ||  Publications  ||  Employment  ||  Support EESI

 
 
Climate Change News – October 28, 2005
 
Brought to you by the Environmental and Energy Study Institute               Carol Werner, Executive Director
 
 
Rep. Kucinich Introduces Resolution of Inquiry on Climate Change
 
On October 26, Rep. Kucinich (D-OH) introduced with 150 cosponsors a Resolution of Inquiry (H. Res. 515) requesting that the White House submit to Congress all documents in their possession relating to the anticipated effects of climate change on the coastal regions of the United States. A Resolution of Inquiry is a rare House procedure used to obtain documents from the Executive Branch. Under House rules, the resolution is referred to committee, and action must be taken in committee within 14 legislative days.
 
On October 27, in a one-minute statement on the House floor, Rep. Kucinich said, "With the devastation of hurricanes Wilma, Rita and others, we are aware that there is a new phenomenon that is affecting this country with respect to climate change. Scientists may dispute whether or not the meteorological changes that we have witnessed are somehow related to changes in the global climate, but one thing for sure, it is important that Congress begin a dialogue with the administration..... It is important that we find out what connection there may be with climate change and effects on coastal regions. Hurricane Katrina certainly illustrated that we should be concerned about climate change." The resolution has been referred to the House Committee on Science.
 
For more information click on the following links: Rep. Kucinich, Congressional Record (10/26/05) and Congressional Record (10/27/05)
 

Wal-Mart Announces Initiative to Cut GHG Emissions
 
On October 24, Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott surprised company observers by embracing sustainability in a speech announcing ambitious initiatives on "all the issues that we've been dealing with historically from a defensive posture." The very fact Wal-Mart is addressing the issues it has so long avoided—including greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction—sends a loud signal to the market from one of the world's largest companies. Observers in the socially responsible investing (SRI) community welcomed the potential changes while maintaining skepticism, noting that the company faces critiques on so many fronts that achieving true social and environmental sustainability would require a radical transformation.
 
Wal-Mart aims to change the way it operates its more than 5,000 stores around the world--mirroring a similar broad-ranging initiative announced this year by General Electric. Scott said Wal-Mart would invest $500 million annually on environmental technologies at its stores, and work towards a goal of producing no waste, and providing fuel from renewable resources. Scott also set a series of firm targets, including reducing the emission of greenhouse gases by 20 percent over the next seven years; designing a new prototype store that is 25 to 30 percent more energy-efficient than existing models within the next four years; and increasing the fuel efficiency of its US truck fleet by 25 percent in the next three years, then doubling it in 10 years.
 
For more information click on the following links: Guardian, SocialFunds.com and Financial Times 
 
 
Arctic System Heading to New, Seasonally Ice-Free State
 
In the August 23 issue of EOS, the weekly journal of the American Geophysical Union, Dr. Jonathan Overpeck of the University of Arizona and 21 other scientists report that the Arctic system is moving toward a new state that falls outside the envelope of glacial-interglacial fluctuations that prevailed during the Earth's recent history. The future Arctic is likely to have dramatically less permanent ice than exists at present. At the current rate of change, a summer ice-free Arctic Ocean within a century is a real possibility, a state not witnessed for at least a million years. The change appears to be driven largely by feedback-enhanced global climate warming, and there seem to be few, if any, processes or feedbacks within the Arctic system that are capable of altering the trajectory toward this “super interglacial” state.
 
On October 25, the New York Times reported that the particularly sharp warming and melting in the Arctic in the last few decades is thought by many experts to result from a mix of human and natural causes, but a number of recent computer simulations show that human influence will dominate in the future. Of the various simulations, all done for an international scientific report on climate trends to be issued in 2007, the only ones that retain much summer sea ice in the Arctic by 2100 are those that assume global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are held constant at rates measured in 2000.
 
Dr. David Barber, an Arctic expert at the University of Manitoba, said GHG emissions needed to be cut quickly to avert even greater damage, and that skeptics who use the uncertainties inherent in climate modeling to justify delaying GHG emission cuts forget that uncertainty cuts both ways, and things could be far worse than forecast. Barber said, "I wish we would have started 50 years ago, but to not start now would be a real tragedy." Henk Brinkhuis, an Arctic ecosystems expert at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, said "Even if you would stop every engine right now, there is no escape unless you physically take the CO2 out of the air again." He added that this would have to be done on a vast scale, far beyond simply planting trees or the like.
 
For more information click on the following links: New York Times and EOS (pdf format)
 
 
New Mexico Water Availability Threatened By Global Warming
 
An analysis of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) data released September 23 by the New Mexico Public Interest Research Group (NMPIRG) and the National Environmental Trust (NET) found—for the first time—that the West’s major river basins are getting warmer, at exactly the time of year water needs to be stored as snow to meet the region’s water needs. The report finds trends that go beyond occasional or seasonal drought, showing a steadily declining snowpack in the mountains that could mean a shortage of water flowing into rivers and communities. Three-fourths of the water used in the West starts as snow.
 
Adriana Blake, Marketing Manager at Taos Ski Valley, said, “Northern New Mexico depends on the Rio Grande River and the Colorado River for our water supply, and both of these rivers are fed by snow melting in the upper reaches of the River basins.... Warmer winters and less snow means that we’ll have even less water available. Global warming is affecting us today.” Chips Barry, manager of Denver Water, Colorado’s largest water utility, said, “All of us, water utilities included, act on the assumption that the future will be a lot like the past. I’m now a lot less confident of that than I used to be. We know that global warming is occurring, and that means much greater uncertainty about our future water supplies.”
 
John Stencel, president of Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, said, “Farmers and ranchers are at the mercy of the weather. This report shows that climate change is already making the weather worse for farmers and ranchers. The drought of 2002 drove a lot of farmers and ranchers out of business across the West. The report shows that those kinds of harsh conditions are likely to become more common.”
 
For more information click on the following links: NMPIRG and Rocky Mountain Climate Organization 
 
 
UK's Prince Charles Says Climate Change is Man’s "Greatest Challenge"
 
Prince Charles says climate change should be seen as the "greatest challenge to face man" and treated as a much bigger priority in the United Kingdom. The Prince of Wales unveiled his vision for the future of the environment, farming and food in an exclusive interview with BBC Radio 4. He said climate change was "what really worries me," and he did not want his future grandchildren to ask why he had not acted over the issue. He said climate change was a big issue for the future of farming, and affected considerations such as which crops should be grown. Prince Charles said, "We should be treating, I think, the whole issue of climate change and global warming with a far greater degree of priority than I think is happening now."
 
Sir David King, the government's chief scientist, endorsed the prince's warning about the dangers of global warming. He said, "Yes, I do agree with him, and I think I have gone on record saying much the same thing.... The point here of course is that it is a global problem that can only be solved with global action. So, by putting it at the head of our G8 agenda alongside African poverty, I think that we [the government] did lead the way." King added, "But also, in setting out in 2003 our energy program, the government stated that by 2050 we will reduce our emissions by 60 percent. That was the most clear statement from any government in the world on action that was being taken to deal with the problem."
 
For more information click on the following links: BBC News, BBC Radio 4 and The Prince of Wales
 
 
EPA Estimates CO2 Control Costs as Low as $1 Per Ton
 
A new cost-benefit analysis by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) indicates that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions control costs could be as low as $1 per ton.  The findings, announced on October 27, are part of an extensive comparison of several pending legislative proposals designed to cut emissions from power plants in the United States.  The EPA compared the Bush Administration’s Clear Skies proposal, which advocates a cap-and-trade approach for sulfur dioxides, nitrogen oxides and mercury, with alternative proposals by Senators James Jeffords (I-VT) and Thomas Carper (D-DE). Sen. Jeffords’ Clean Power Act and Sen. Carper’s Clean Air Planning Act both include mandatory emissions caps for CO2 in addition to sulfur dioxides, nitrogen oxides and mercury. The Jeffords proposal would cap CO2 emissions at 2.05 tons per year by 2010 while the Carper proposal would cap emissions at 2.65 billion tons per year by 2009.
 
In the EPA analysis, the controls for CO2 would cost as little as $1 per ton if the Carper proposal was adopted, while the Jeffords proposal would cost $16 per ton of CO2 emissions.  The Administration’s Clear Skies proposal does not include provisions for mandatory  CO2 caps. These new findings call into question the contention that controlling CO2 emissions would necessarily result in large cost increases for utilities and consumers.
 
For more information click on the following links: New York Times and EPA
 
 
Evangelical Christians Push For Climate Change Plan
 
The National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) plans to release their first policy statement on global warming in the next few weeks. That statement will likely call for mandatory greenhouse gas controls, a policy observers say could force the Bush administration and some conservative Republicans to choose between supporting a key part of their religious base and fossil-fuel industry’s long-standing opposition to climate change legislation. The group says it wants to reframe the debate because climate change legislation has been bogged down in political fights between allies of environmentalists and industry on Capitol Hill. While sources would not detail the contents of the upcoming statement, leaders of the effort suggest it would likely endorse mandatory controls. “Do I think we can get there on a voluntary means? No,” says a top official with NAE.
 
The NAE source criticizes the climate change position of Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman James Inhofe (R-OK), a leading skeptic of the science supporting human responsibility for climate change. “I don’t buy what some people say that this is not significantly human-induced,” the source told Inside Washington Publishers. “And I don’t understand why fellow evangelical Jim Inhofe calls [climate change] a big hoax.” The policy statement will be signed by over 35 evangelical leaders from across the country.
 
 
 
Africa Aid Endangered by Climate Change Costs
 
On October 24, a letter from Lord May of Oxford, the President of the Royal Society, has warned Margaret Beckett, the British Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, and other G8 energy and environment ministers that, "As long as greenhouse gas concentrations continue to rise, there is the very real prospect that the increase in aid agreed at Gleneagles will be entirely consumed by the mounting cost of dealing with the added burden of adverse effects of climate change in Africa.... Therefore, if the increase in aid and other measures outlined in the Gleneagles action plan on Africa are to create maximum benefit, they must be accompanied by effective action on climate change by stopping the inexorable rise of greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere."
 
G8 leaders—under the presidency of British Prime Minister Tony Blair—agreed at their July summit in Gleneagles, Scotland, to spend $25 billion a year more on Africa where poverty kills a child every 10 seconds. They also agreed to take a series of measures to tackle global warming, which scientists predict will put millions of lives at risk—mainly in the poorest countries—through increased incidence of floods, drought and rising sea levels. However, while acknowledging that human activities like burning fossil fuels were a major contributor to emissions of greenhouse gases, they failed to set any targets or deadlines for action. Lord May wrote, "In short, the scientific evidence now presents a more compelling case than ever before for tackling the threat from climate change by stopping the rise of greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere."
 
For more information click on the following links: The Royal Society and Reuters 
 
 
EESI Briefings
 
November 8, 2005       The G8+5 Dialog and Upcoming COP/MOP Conference in Canada
 
The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) presents a briefing to hear from the British government about the outcome of the G8+5 Climate Change Meeting to be held November 1 in London and from the Canadian government on the upcoming 11th Annual Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP-11) and the first Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (MOP-1) in Montréal on November 28 though December 9, 2005. The briefing will take place from 2:00–3:30 pm, Tuesday, November 8 in 124 Dirksen Senate Office Building. The speakers will be posted in the next edition of Climate Change News.  For more information, please contact Fred Beck at fbeck@eesi.org or 202-662-1892, or click on the following link for more information: EESI 
 
 
DVD’s Available: Copies of DVD's are available of EESI's recent climate briefings: "Agriculture and Climate Change: Threats and Opportunities," May 24, 2005; "What Does Climate Change Mean for the Arctic? How is Alaska Being Affected?," March 15, 2005; "Perspectives on Climate Change: Business Initiatives to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions," November 18, 2004; “State and Local Government Climate Change Efforts,” September 28, 2004; “Climate Change Post 2100,” September 21, 2004; “Abrupt Climate Change,” September 15, 2004; and “Discussing Climate Change: A Multi-faceted View of the Climate Stewardship Act,” June 3, 2004. The discs are $20 ea. (incl. shipping/handling) plus tax 5.75% (DC residents only). Click on the following link to order a DVD: EESI Climate Change DVD's
 

Events
 
November 1, 2005       Climate & Oceans & Policy Conference
 
The Royal Norwegian Embassy is organizing the Third Trans-Atlantic  Cooperative Research Conference with a theme of "Climate & Oceans: Factual Observations, Predictions, and Alternative Ways Forward." The principal objective of the Conference is to provide a collaborative network arena for front-line, solution-oriented research relating to the international climate regime. Through its coverage of substantial research topics, the conference-sequence is intended to foster further cooperation between scientific and higher education entities, as well as industry-related institutions in Norway and the US, and also providing for participation from other countries and relevant multilateral institutions. The event takes place Tuesday, November 1, from 9:00am-6:00pm at the Carnegie Institution, 1530 P Street, NW, Washington, DC. Click on the following link for more information: Royal Norwegian Embassy
 
 
November 14-16, 2005       US Climate Change Science Program Workshop
 
The US Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) is holding a workshop on November 14-16, 2005, at the Crystal Gateway Marriott in Arlington, Virginia—addressing the capability of climate science to inform decision-making. The workshop will serve as a forum to address the Program’s progress and future plans. The workshop will include discussion of decision-maker needs for scientific information on climate variability and change, as well as expected outcomes of CCSP’s research and assessment activities that are necessary for sound resource management, adaptive planning, and policy formulation. There is a fee for this event. Click on the following link for more information: CCSP
 
 
November 15, 2005          Legal Issues of Climate Change
 
The American University Washington College of Law is holding a conference on "The Legal Dimensions of Climate Change: A conference by and for the Legal Profession" which will cover: the importance of climate change to lawyers; national, state and municipal policy initiatives; the global perspective; and corporate risks and opportunities. The event will be held at American University at 4801 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC on Tuesday, November 15, from 8:30am-5:00pm. The event is free but registration is required. For more information call 202-274-4075 or email secle@wcl.american.edu, or click the following link: American University
 
 
November 16, 2005        Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) Implementation
 
The American Bar Association's (ABA) Renewable Energy Resources Committee will host a teleconference with a panel of experts who will discuss what is happening with state Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) initiatives and look at some of the key issues, such as renewable energy credits, that have yet to be resolved.  The event takes place on Wednesday, November 16 from 12:15-1:30 pm EDT.  There is a $20 charge for this event.  Click on the following link for more information: ABA
 
 
November 18, 2005        The Science of Predicting Washington's Weather and Global Climate
 
NBC4 Meteorologist Chuck Bell and Dr. Antonio Busalacchi from the University of Maryland will address how weather in the future may be impacted by the changing climate, will explain how to create a forecast from real-life data, and speak about climate modeling, including how climate change and variability may alter weather patterns in the future, and what impact this may have on the DC area. The event is at the Marian Koshland Science Museum on Friday, November 18 from 6:30-8:30pm. The museum is located at the corner of 6th and E Streets, NW in Washington, DC. Reservations are required and there is a $10 fee for this event. Email ksm@nas.edu or call 202.334.1201 to RSVP. Click on the following link for more information: Marian Koshland Science Museum 
 

This weekly email-newsletter is intended to inform recipients of the latest climate change-related news. The newsletter is a free EESI publication intended for all interested parties, particularly the policymaker community. Issues are archived on our website at www.eesi.org under ‘Publications.’ For more information regarding either the newsletter or EESI, please contact Fredric Beck at fbeck@eesi.org or 202-662-1892.

 

 

Home  |  About EESI Programs Briefings  |  Publications Employment  |  Support EESI

122 C Street, NW, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20001 |  Phone: (202) 628-1400  |  Fax: (202) 628-1825  |  eesi@eesi.org