Home  ||  About EESI  ||  Programs  ||  Briefings  ||  Publications  ||  Employment  ||  Support EESI

 
Climate Change News – January 12, 2007
 
Brought to you by the Environmental and Energy Study Institute               Carol Werner, Executive Director
 
 
Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act Introduced
 
On January 12, Sen. Lieberman (I-CT), with cosponsors McCain (R-AZ), Lincoln (D-AR), Snowe (R-ME), Obama (D-IL) and Collins (R-ME) introduced the Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act of 2007. The Act caps the greenhouse-gas emissions of the electric power, industrial, transportation, and commercial sectors of the economy at year 2004 levels by 2012.  It then lowers that cap gradually, such that it reaches 1/3 of year 2004 levels by 2050.
 
According to a fact sheet describing the legislation, the Act controls compliance costs by allowing companies to trade, save, and borrow emissions credits, and by allowing them to generate credits when they induce non-covered businesses, farms, and others to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions or capture and store greenhouse gases. The Act invests set-aside emissions credits and money raised by the auction of such allowances in: deploying advanced technologies and practices for reducing greenhouse gas emissions; protecting low- and middle-income Americans from higher energy costs; keeping good jobs in the United States; and mitigating the negative impacts of any unavoidable global warming on low- and middle-income Americans, low-income populations abroad, and wildlife.
 
Rep. Olver (D-MA) and Gilchrest (R-MD) are expected to introduce their companion bill within two weeks. The bill will be based on the Climate Stewardship Acts introduced in previous Congresses, but updated to include a long-term declining cap to 2050.
 
Click on the following links for the full news stories: Seattle Post-Intelligencer and Hartford Courant 
 

California Establishes Low Carbon Fuels Standard
 
On January 9, California Governor Schwarzenegger announced in his State of the State address that he will issue an Executive Order establishing a Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) for transportation fuels sold in California. By 2020, the standard will reduce the carbon intensity of California's passenger vehicle fuels by at least 10 percent.  This first-of-its kind standard will support AB 32 emissions targets as part of California's overall strategy to fight global warming.
 
"Transportation accounts for forty percent of California's annual greenhouse gas emissions, and we rely on petroleum-based fuels for an overwhelming 96 percent of our transportation needs," said Governor Schwarzenegger.  "This petroleum dependency contributes to climate change and leaves workers, businesses and consumers vulnerable to price shocks from an unstable global energy market.  As a world leader in energy efficiency, alternative energy and reducing greenhouse gases, California's new low carbon standard is an innovative action that will diversify our fuel supplies and establish a vibrant market for cleaner-burning fuels."
 
The new standard is expected to reduce emissions by 13 million metric tons, more than half of the 24 million metric tons of carbon dioxide the state will need to eliminate to meet 1990 vehicle emission levels.
 
Click on the following links for the full news stories: Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, New York Times and Governor Schwarzenegger 
 

EU Proposes Energy Policy to Address Climate Change
 
On January 10, the European Commission proposed a comprehensive package of measures to establish a new energy policy for Europe to combat climate change and boost the EU's energy security and competitiveness. The package of proposals set a series of targets on greenhouse gas emissions and renewable energy and aim to create a true internal market for energy and strengthen effective regulation. The Commission believes that when an international agreement is reached on the post-2012 framework this should lead to a 30 percent cut in emissions from developed countries by 2020. To further underline its commitment, the Commission proposes that the European Union commits now to cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least 20 percent by 2020, in particular through energy measures.
 
Stavros Dimas, Commissioner for the Environment, said "Climate change is one of the gravest threats to our planet. Acting against climate change is imperative. Today, we have agreed on a set of ambitious, but realistic targets which will support our global efforts to contain climate change and its most dire consequences. I urge the rest of the developed world to follow our lead, match our reductions and accelerate progress towards an international agreement on the global emission reductions."
 
As part of accelerating the shift to low carbon energy, the Commission proposes to maintain the EU's position as a world leader in renewable energy by proposing a binding target of 20 percent of its overall energy mix to be sourced from renewable energy by 2020. This will require significant growth in all three renewable energy sectors: electricity, biofuels and heating and cooling. This renewables target will be supplemented by a minimum target for biofuels of 10 percent. In addition, a 2007 renewables legislative package will include specific measures to facilitate the market penetration of both biofuels and heating and cooling.
 
Research is also crucial to lower the cost of clean energy and to put EU industry at the forefront of the rapidly growing low carbon technology sector. To meet these objectives, the Commission will propose a strategic European Energy Technology Plan. The European Union will also increase by at least 50 percent its annual spending on energy research for the next seven years.
 
Click on the following links for the full news stories: European Commission and UPI 
 

EU Considers Mandatory Tailpipe GHG Standards
 
The European Commission wants to impose mandatory efficiency standards on all new vehicles sold in Europe as part of a master plan to combat climate change. Currently, the EU has a voluntary agreement with motor vehicle manufacturers, signed in 1998, to reduce emissions by 25 percent by 2008—but they have missed their target by almost 50 percent.
 
The Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas now wants mandatory standards that will allow the average car to emit just 120 grams of carbon dioxide (CO2) per kilometer (g/km). That would mean a 1.6 liter Ford Focus would need to cut emissions by a third to qualify as an average vehicle under the new regime. Car manufacturers will be able to average out their overall CO2 targets over their entire range of vehicles.
 
The Citroen C3 diesel emits exactly 120 grams of carbon per kilometer. A supercharged Range Rover Sport V8 emits 376 g/km and the gas-electric hybrid Toyota Prius produces 104 g/km. Car manufacturers said the proposals, which apply only to new cars, would prove devastating for stand-alone sports car builders, such as Porsche, and specialist manufacturers such as Land Rover.
 
As reported by the Telegraph, Mr. Dimas insisted that they would not be forced out of business. The way he sees the legislation working is that manufacturers would subsidize cheaper, high volume family cars and pass the increased costs of developing new, low-emission vehicles on to the buyers of more polluting cars.
 
Click on the following links for the full news stories: The Telegraph and BBC 
 

EIA Finds Mandatory Carbon Cap Would Not Harm US Economy

On January 11, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) released an analysis of a detailed discussion draft on global warming legislation. The draft analyzed was a modified version of a draft originally submitted by Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Bingaman (D-NM) as an amendment to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (PL 109-58), but which was withdrawn for further development after discussion with then-Chair Domenici (R-NM). According to a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee press release, EIA finds that the proposed mandatory steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions can be achieved at very low cost to American households and without harming the U.S. economy.
 
According to EIA, the climate plan would have the following impacts: Compared to projected emissions without the program, emissions are lowered by 5 percent (372 million tons) in 2015 and 11 percent (909 million tons) in 2025, and 14 percent (1259 million tons) by 2030.  Costs to the U.S. economy would total 0.1 percent of GDP through 2030. Cumulative GDP is projected to double from 2006 to 2030. Electricity prices would rise by less than 11 percent by 2030. Coal use would grow by 23 percent by 2030, compared to 53 percent without the program. Natural gas demand is projected to increase by a mere 1 percent by 2030. Non-hydro renewable electricity generation would rise by 53 percent by 2030.
 
As reported by Congress Daily, to limit the effect on the economy, Bingaman has included a "safety valve" that initially limits to $7 per ton the amount that industry would have to pay for exceeding emission limits. That amount would increase annually by 5 percent above the projected inflation rate. Sen. Bingaman's plan would establish annual emission limits to reduce greenhouse gas "intensity," derived by dividing greenhouse gas emissions by the forecasted gross domestic product for a given year. This intensity would be reduced 2.6 percent annually between 2012 and 2021 and by 3 percent a year after that, according to the analysis.
 
Sen. Bingaman said,  “I am committed to developing bipartisan climate change legislation that can pass the Congress this year. Getting good analysis of draft legislation is the critical first step to understanding the impacts of global warming policy.  I plan to hold a hearing to review the results of this analysis.”
 
Click on the following links for the full news stories: Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and EIA (pdf format) 
 

NOAA Reports 2006 Warmest Year on Record for U.S.
 
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) reports that 2006 was the warmest year for the 48 contiguous states since regular temperature records began in 1895. NOAA says this is due to a general climatic warming trend, in addition to El Niño contributing to milder winter temperatures.
 
As reported in NOAA's press release, "A contributing factor to the unusually warm temperatures throughout 2006 also is the long-term warming trend, which has been linked to increases in greenhouse gases. This has made warmer-than-average conditions more common in the U.S. and other parts of the world. It is unclear how much of the recent anomalous warmth was due to greenhouse-gas-induced warming and how much was due to the El Niño-related circulation pattern. It is known that El Niño is playing a major role in this winter's short-term warm period."
 
Based on preliminary data, the 2006 annual average temperature was 55°F--2.2°F (1.2°C) above the 20th Century mean and 0.07°F (0.04°C) warmer than 1998. U.S. and global annual temperatures are now approximately 1.0°F warmer than at the start of the 20th century, and the rate of warming has accelerated over the past 30 years, increasing globally since the mid-1970s at a rate approximately three times faster than the century-scale trend. The past nine years have all been among the 25 warmest years on record for the contiguous United States, a streak which is unprecedented in the historical record.
 
Click on the following links for the full news stories: Washington PostNew York Times and NOAA 
 

Study Looks at Cost of Climate Change to Washington State
 
Climate change is already affecting Washington's economy, according to a $100,000 study requested by the departments of Ecology and Community Trade and Economic Development (CTED) that was released January 10. A team of scientists and economists evaluated climate change in producing the state report, "Impacts of Climate Change on Washington's Economy." The study warns that economic effects are likely to grow in the Pacific Northwest as temperatures increase.
 
A warming Pacific Northwest, extreme weather, reduced snow pack and sea level rise are four major ways climate change is disrupting Washington's economy, environment and communities. The research team reached three conclusions about the effects of climate change on Washington's economy: climate change impacts are already occurring in Washington State and their economic effects are becoming apparent; the economic effects of climate change in Washington will grow as temperatures and sea levels rise, and; although global warming and the economic disruption it causes will increase over time, new economic opportunities are already available.
 
Key evidence of climate change effects in Washington include: retreating glaciers, decreasing snow pack, lower summer stream flows, more wildfires, and rising sea levels. "It's safe to say that virtually every aspect of the state's economy will be affected by climate change," said co-author Bob Doppelt, director of the Climate Leadership Initiative at the University of Oregon, in a teleconference after the study's release. "But the impacts are manageable with an appropriate response, and climate change does open the door for new economic opportunities."
 
Click on the following links for the full news stories: Seattle Post-Intelligencer and State of Washington 
 

Global Risk Report Highlights Climate Change
 
The Global Risks 2007 report released today highlights a growing disconnect between the power of global risks to cause major systemic disruption, and our ability to mitigate them. The annual Global Risks report – published by the World Economic Forum in cooperation with Citigroup, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Swiss Re and the Wharton School Risk Center – suggests that many of the 23 core global risks explored in the report have worsened over the last 12 months, despite growing awareness of their potential impacts. In addition to specific risk mitigation measures, institutional innovations may be needed to create effective responses to a complex risk landscape.
 
From the range of economic, environmental, geopolitical, societal and technological threats, the "Global Risks 2007" report pinpointed climate change as "one of the defining challenges of the 21st century." The report recommends a number of key needs for addressing specific global risks, including linking energy security with considerations on climate change and urgently beginning work on a successor to the Kyoto agreement with three central principles: involvement of the United States and major developing countries (particularly China and India); differential responsibilities for future emissions’ reduction dependent upon past emissions and stage of economic development; and, common overall responsibility for climate change.
 
Click on the following links for the full news stories: AFP and World Economic Forum
 
 
EESI Briefings
 
DVD’s Available: Copies of DVD's are available of EESI's recent climate briefings: "Agriculture and Climate Change: Threats and Opportunities," May 24, 2005; "What Does Climate Change Mean for the Arctic? How is Alaska Being Affected?," March 15, 2005; "Perspectives on Climate Change: Business Initiatives to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions," November 18, 2004; State and Local Government Climate Change Efforts,” September 28, 2004; Climate Change Post 2100,” September 21, 2004; “Abrupt Climate Change,” September 15, 2004; and Discussing Climate Change: A Multi-faceted View of the Climate Stewardship Act,” June 3, 2004. The discs are $20 ea. (incl. shipping/handling) plus tax 5.75% (DC residents only). Click on the following link to order a DVD: EESI Climate Change DVD's
 
 

This EESI publication is a free, weekly electronic newsletter intended to inform interested parties, particularly the policymaker community, of the latest climate change-related news. Permission for reproduction of this newsletter is granted provided that EESI is properly acknowledged as the source. Past issues are archived on our website, www.eesi.orgunder "Publications."  Please click here to subscribe to this newsletter and other EESI publications. To discontinue receiving this newsletter, please notify Fredric Beck at fbeck@eesi.org or 202-662-1892.


The Environmental and Energy Study Institute is a non-profit organization established in 1984 by a bipartisan, bicameral group of members of Congress to provide timely information on energy and environmental policy issues to policymakers and stakeholders and develop innovative policy solutions that set us on a cleaner, more secure and sustainable energy path.
 
This newsletter and EESI's other valuable work in energy, climate change, agriculture, transportation and smart growth are made possible through financial support from people like you.  Please donate now.  Your tax-deductible contribution will help EESI develop innovative policy solutions for a cleaner, safer, healthier world.  EIN: 52-1268030.  For more information, visit www.eesi.org or contact Ruth Lampi at  rlampi@eesi.org or 202-662-1887. 

 

Home  |  About EESI Programs Briefings  |  Publications Employment  |  Support EESI

122 C Street, NW, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20001 |  Phone: (202) 628-1400  |  Fax: (202) 628-1825  |  eesi@eesi.org