|
THE NATIONAL CLEAN BUS
NETWORK
TEA-21 Reauthorization and Clean Bus Deployment
How
SAFETEA Addresses Recommendations of Members of the National Clean
Bus Network
The
Administration released its proposal for reauthorization of the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) on May 14,
2003. The Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation
Equity Act of 2003 (SAFETEA) would authorize federal resource
expenditures for the maintenance and development of the
national surface transportation system. Details of the proposal
can be found by clicking here.
1. Strengthen the
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ)
CMAQ was established in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 and reauthorized under
the Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21st Century
(TEA-21). It provides flexible funding to State and local
governments to help meet the requirements of the federal Clean Air
Act. Projects and programs eligible for CMAQ funding include transit
improvements, travel demand management strategies, traffic flow
improvements, and public vehicle fleet conversions to cleaner fuels,
among other options.
RProvides
funding to non-attainment and maintenance areas under new PM2.5 and
new 8-hour ozone standards.
RPermits
the Secretary to use 0.5 percent of annual CMAQ apportionments to
carry out a national program of evaluation and assessment of
projects regarding effectiveness of reducing emissions and relieving
congestion. Assessments will be stored in a database and shared with
state and local transportation and air quality agencies prior to
release.
RProvides
specific eligibility for projects or programs to reduce emissions
per vehicle. This emphasizes technology-based solutions, specifying
transit buses, school buses and other vehicles.
REncourages
States and metropolitan planning organizations to consult with state
and local air quality agencies on the estimated emissions reductions
of projects and programs.
TDoes
not specifically make public health improvements, greenhouse gas
reductions or petroleum displacement a focus of the CMAQ program.
TDoes
not establish quantifiable goals as the basis for funding decisions
TDoes
not add education program dollars to encourage regional and local
authorities to use CMAQ funds.
2.
Strengthen the Clean Fuels Formula “Clean Bus” Grant Program
Established under TEA-21, this program would have provided a minimum $100
million (and a maximum $200 million) to transportation management
areas for the purchasing and/or leasing of clean fuel buses (defined
as being powered by natural gas, biodiesel, electric and
hybrid-electric propulsion, alcohol fuels, fuel cells, clean diesel
or other low-emissions technology) and supporting infrastructure,
and for the repowering, retrofitting and rebuilding of pre-1993 bus
engines.
TThe
Administration’s proposal eliminates
the Clean Fuels Formula “Clean Bus” Grant Program which would
have provided incentives for the purchase of new buses using
alternative fuels and advanced vehicle technologies and supporting
infrastructure. Under TEA-21 this program guaranteed a minimum $100
million annually, but congressional appropriators diverted these
funds to project earmarks. Additionally, the Department of
Transportation failed to produce regulations for the program until
2002, four years behind schedule. SAFETEA does not propose a
replacement for this program or any similar incentive mechanism.
3.
Promote Cleaner Choices in the Major Capital Investments “New
Starts” Program
R
Makes non-fixed guideway systems like Bus Rapid Transit
eligible for “new starts” funding.
T
Eliminates parity between highway and transit modes by changing the
federal/local funding ratio for new starts projects from 80/20
to 50/50. This produces an incentive to invest in highway
projects over transit projects.
4.
Add Incentives for Advanced Vehicle Technology and Alternative Fuels
Infrastructure
T
Does not provide incentives to aid in infrastructure investments to
support cleaner fuels and engine efficiency technologies
5.
Promote the Flexibility Incentive Grant (FIG) Program
Proposed by the Amalgamated Transit
Union
(ATU), the FIG Program would provide incentives to encourage states
to establish new sources of revenue for transit projects and
services and to reward states for creating more flexibility in the
use of their existing transportation funds. Rep. Julia Carson (IN-7th)
is seeking co-sponsors for this legislation.
T Does not
include the Amalgamated Transit Union’s proposal for an incentive
grant program to allocate flexible transportation funds to states
that establish dedicated funding mechanisms for transit programs and
projects.
T
Does not provide incentives to projects meeting multiple
performance goals, such as the percentage of vehicle emissions
reduced and/or the percentage of petroleum fuel displaced.
6.
Support the Research and Development of Cleaner Transit Choices
R
SAFETEA proposes a new Multimodal
Research Program to replace the Advanced Vehicle Technologies
Program (49 USC 5506) to continue the development of hybrid-electric
propulsion, advanced batteries, fuel cells and other engine
efficiency technologies. The program would receive $100 million from
the Highway Trust Fund over six years.
T
Would not provide funding for information dissemination and outreach
to states, regional transit authorities and localities regarding new
technologies and their development. Education and communication
programs help speed the research and development process.
7.
Support the Deployment of Cleaner Vehicles through the Transit in Parks
Program
R
Would establish a new Federal Lands Transit Program authorizing the
Secretary of Transportation to carry out the development of public
transportation projects on or near federal lands. (T Deployment of clean-powered vehicles would not
receive priority).
8.
Give Public Health, Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Oil Displacement
Initiatives Greater Priority
R
Creates a program to study strategies for improving the energy efficiency
of and greenhouse gas emissions from transportation, as well as the
effects of climate change on the transportation system.
R
Permits the establishment of idling-reduction facilities at recreation
areas and rest stops which are designed to save on fuel consumption
and reduce emissions.
T Does
not give priority through incentives or funding criteria to projects
that improve public health, reduce greenhouse gas emissions or
displace petroleum
|