Advanced Search
September 24, 2019
Download the Climate Security Plan for America
The Center for Climate and Security, in partnership with the Environmental and Energy Study Institute, held the 2019 Climate and National Security Forum: A Climate Security Plan for America. This year’s forum focused on the risks that climate change presents to U.S. military bases and operations, and on the launch of the Climate and Security Advisory Group’s which calls on the U.S. President to recognize climate change as a vital national security threat and issue a National Strategy to fulfill a “responsibility to prepare for and prevent” that threat.
Carol Werner, Executive Director, EESI: It’s important to understand how climate change impacts our national security in so many different ways. John Conger, Director, the Center for Climate and Security: This is a national security topic. The Center for Climate and Security is not an environmental group that works on a security topic as a side issue. This is a security group that’s looking at an environmental issue. We’re looking at this from a national security perspective and dealing with a very difficult issue. The agenda for the day:
General Ron Keys, U.S. Air Force (Ret); Senior Member, Center for Climate and Security Advisory Board; Chairman, CNA Military Advisory Board; former Commanding General, Air Combat Command.
Q&A for General Ron Keys
What are the impacts of climate change on the Air Force, specifically?
Can you discuss possible base closures?
How does climate change lead to conflict?
What can the military do to help island nations?
Lt. General John G. Castellaw, United States Marine Corps (Ret); Former Chief of Staff, U.S. Central Command
Rear Admiral Ann C. Phillips, Special Assistant to the Governor for Coastal Adaptation and Protection, State of Virginia; U.S. Navy (Ret); Former Commander, Expeditionary Strike Group TWO
Brigadier General Gerald Galloway, Professor of Engineering, University of Maryland; U.S. Army (Ret); Former Dean of the Academic Board, West Point
Joan VanDervort, Former Deputy Director for Ranges, Sea and Airspace
Panel One Q&A:
Is the United States particularly vulnerable to climate change compared to other nations?
How can DOD use its partnerships to move forward on climate issues?
With the increased flooding that comes with climate change, there will be more free-standing water. Diseases that fester in such waters are some of the biggest killers in the world. How will climate change affect global health security?
Caitlin Werrell, Co-Founder, Center for Climate and Security; CEO, Council on Strategic Risks
Francesco Femia (moderator), Co-Founder, Center for Climate and Security; CEO, Council on Strategic Risks
Introduction:
Vice Admiral Dennis McGinn, U.S. Navy (Ret.); Senior Member, Center for Climate and Security Advisory Board; Former Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Energy, Installations & Environment
Dr. Rod Schoonover, Ecological Futures Group; Former Director of Environment and Natural Resources, National Intelligence Council Framing question: The intelligence community has been warning about climate change risks to security for many years now (it's been in the Worldwide Threat Assessment issued by the Director of National Intelligence, for example, every year for the past 11 years). Despite that, we've seen how political pressure or a simple lack of interest can obscure such analysis. How do we avoid that? How do we both ensure that such assessments continue, and ensure that the U.S. government is using them (and not ignoring them) when shaping policy?
Hon. Sherri Goodman, Chair of the Board, the Council on Strategic Risks; Former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense (Environmental Security) Framing question: Doing something big on climate change is often touted as an altruistic thing for the United States to do, especially at the international level. And it certainly can be that. But there are also many potential strategic benefits for the United States to act on climate change, vis-a-vis both our allies and our competitors and adversaries. Why are we not taking advantage of that? And what can be done to more fully realize those strategic benefits?
Hon. John Conger, Director, Center for Climate and Security; Former Principal Deputy Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller) Framing question: The United States is clearly not immune to the security risks of climate change. More devastating extreme weather events, often exacerbated by climate change, have in recent years cost many American lives, and disrupted many parts of this nation's critical infrastructure, including major military bases such as Tyndall, Offutt, and others. The military recognizes this, but it doesn't seem like the United States is fully prepared for these cascading disasters, from flooding to wildfires. What needs to happen, on the adaptation side and the mitigation side, to both adequately prepare us for locked-in security risks of climate change, and to prevent the avoidable worst-case scenarios?
Panel Two Q&A:
How likely are these recommendations to be implemented?
To what extent does the report address decarbonization?
Will the Arctic remain a zone of peace, or do you see it becoming a place of geopolitical and military competition?
How do our climate security initiatives stack up against China and Russia?