Are We Ready for National Carbon and REC Markets?

Speakers (l-r): Dan Abbasi, Brian Storms, Jon Anda, Chela Bordas O'Connor, Thomas Callahan, Michael Schwartz, and Nat Keohane

Are We Ready for National Carbon and REC Markets?

Monday, March 30, 2009
12:00 - 2:00 p.m.
B340 Rayburn House Office Building


On March 30, the Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) and MissionPoint Capital Partners held a lunch briefing to explore environmental market systems. With Congress contemplating creation of a national carbon market and revisiting a national renewable portfolio standard that would establish national trading of renewable energy credits (RECs), it is becoming increasingly important to understand how such market-based systems are actually structured and administered, and what kind of reliability they can offer. Issues of market transparency, integrity, oversight and regulation loom even larger amidst the backdrop of a severe financial crisis. Can environmental “commodities” such as RECs, carbon allowances and offsets be reliably tracked? Are adequate tools available to manage oversight and establish market confidence? Speakers for this event included:



Highlights from Speaker Presentations

  • A national carbon market would drive emissions reductions at minimum cost. Markets have been successful in addressing environmental problems in the past (e.g. acid rain program, which met objectives ahead of schedule at a fraction of the expected cost).
  • The global carbon market was worth $118 billion in 2008, an 84 percent increase over 2007.
  • Credibility, particularly for monitoring and verification, is crucial to the viability of a carbon market. The majority of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions are already tracked due to mandates on power producers and the oil and gas industries.
  • It could be problematic to hold 100 percent auction of carbon permits right away. The carbon market could be "short float", increasing the risk of trading volatility. One possible solution would be the distribution of some free allowances in early years before phasing them out and transitioning to 100 percent auction.
  • Central counterparty clearing could eliminate bilateral risks in a national carbon market by keeping those risks contained within the defaulting companies, such as Lehman Brothers was under the London Clearing House.
  • Transparency and enforcement play a significant role in creating a strong carbon market. Transparency can be supported through trading on exchanges and real-time, audit-backed, reporting. Enforcement means regulators should be answerable to the public and offenders legally challenged.
  • There are currently five renewable energy credit/certificate (REC) markets in North America, covering all but eleven states in the United States. These markets could be pulled together relatively quickly to form a national generator database and central depository for inter-registry transfers.
  • In addition to RECs, the Midwest Renewable Energy Tracking System (M-RETS) issues energy efficiency certificates (EECs), known as white tags, and verified emission reductions (VERs). EECs could potentially build a significant market.


MissionPoint is an investment firm exclusively focused on financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. This is the second in a series of Hill briefings that MissionPoint is co-sponsoring to describe selected pieces of the low-carbon puzzle that it has experience evaluating, backing and strategically accelerating. Please click here for information from the first briefing, which focused on smart grid technology and policy.


For more information, contact Laura Parsons at (202) 662-1884 or lparsons [at] eesi.org.


Please click here to subscribe to our e-mail list for event notices or newsletters.